
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.3 by Marek Hlavac, Social Policy Institute. E-mail: marek.hlavac at gmail.com
% Date and time: Thu, Jun 06, 2024 - 13:02:24
\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering 
  \caption{Replication of Table 3 with lagged variables} 
  \label{} 
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lcccc} 
\\[-1.8ex]\hline 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 & \multicolumn{4}{c}{\textit{Dependent variable:}} \\ 
\cline{2-5} 
 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Vote choice (-1/0/1)} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Transfer offer (0/1)} \\ 
\\[-1.8ex] & (1) & (2) & (3) & (4)\\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 cutoff1 & 7.068 & 6.647 &  &  \\ 
  & (4.673) & (4.787) &  &  \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 cutoff2 & 9.117 & 8.726 &  &  \\ 
  & (4.709) & (4.819) &  &  \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Diff. in adjusted beliefs & 1.081 & 0.517 & $-$0.575 & $-$1.646 \\ 
  & (0.800) & (0.906) & (0.943) & (1.146) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Private transfer offered & 4.245$^{**}$ & 3.729$^{**}$ &  &  \\ 
  & (0.525) & (0.623) &  &  \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Monitoring capacity &  &  & 2.420$^{**}$ & 0.691 \\ 
  &  &  & (0.499) & (0.724) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Role in the first six rounds & $-$0.351 & $-$0.445 & 0.120 & 0.102 \\ 
  & (0.644) & (0.665) & (0.782) & (0.890) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Age & 0.145 & 0.140 & $-$0.559$^{*}$ & $-$0.579$^{*}$ \\ 
  & (0.188) & (0.193) & (0.260) & (0.291) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Female & 2.057$^{**}$ & 2.122$^{**}$ & 0.071 & 0.223 \\ 
  & (0.733) & (0.755) & (0.803) & (0.918) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Christian & $-$0.428 & $-$0.464 & 0.986 & 0.882 \\ 
  & (0.748) & (0.768) & (0.890) & (1.005) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Muslim & 1.110 & 1.254 & 0.552 & 0.633 \\ 
  & (0.979) & (1.013) & (1.200) & (1.369) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Choice in the beauty contest & $-$0.019 & $-$0.021 & $-$0.012 & $-$0.020 \\ 
  & (0.016) & (0.016) & (0.019) & (0.022) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Num. of correct answers in the CRT & $-$0.163 & $-$0.185 & 0.481 & 0.464 \\ 
  & (0.299) & (0.307) & (0.377) & (0.426) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Altruism & $-$0.136 & $-$0.125 & 0.062 & $-$0.014 \\ 
  & (0.240) & (0.246) & (0.289) & (0.330) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Positive reciprocity & 0.489 & 0.507 & 0.273 & 0.349 \\ 
  & (0.280) & (0.288) & (0.318) & (0.364) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Round & 0.093 & 0.091 & $-$0.345$^{*}$ & $-$0.453$^{**}$ \\ 
  & (0.111) & (0.112) & (0.150) & (0.165) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Private transfer offer in the previous round & 0.463 & 0.593 &  &  \\ 
  & (0.677) & (0.684) &  &  \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Vote choice in the previous round & 0.022 & $-$0.056 &  &  \\ 
  & (0.400) & (0.405) &  &  \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Punished in the previous round & $-$1.076 & $-$1.234 &  &  \\ 
  & (0.832) & (0.842) &  &  \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Diff. in adjusted beliefs X Private transfer offered &  & 1.108 &  &  \\ 
  &  & (0.809) &  &  \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Monitoring capacity in the previous round &  &  & $-$0.533 & $-$0.455 \\ 
  &  &  & (0.484) & (0.504) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Offered a private transfer in the previous round &  &  & 0.995 & 0.821 \\ 
  &  &  & (0.604) & (0.609) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Voter was punished in the previous round &  &  & $-$0.204 & 0.002 \\ 
  &  &  & (0.627) & (0.669) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Diff. in adjusted beliefs X Monitoring capacity &  &  &  & 3.380$^{**}$ \\ 
  &  &  &  & (1.180) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
 Constant &  &  & 8.890 & 10.420 \\ 
  &  &  & (5.936) & (6.703) \\ 
  & & & & \\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
Observations & 300 & 300 & 300 & 300 \\ 
Observations &  &  & 300 & 300 \\ 
Log Likelihood &  &  & $-$137.438 & $-$132.977 \\ 
Bayesian Inf. Crit. &  &  & 371.841 & 368.622 \\ 
\hline 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\textit{Note:}  & \multicolumn{4}{l}{Models 1 to 4 use random effect regressions (ologit for Models 1 and 2 and logit for Models 3 and 4); standard errors in parentheses; cutoffs are suppressed in the report; * p<0.05, ** p<0.01} \\ 
\end{tabular} 
\end{table} 
